USuncutMN says: Tax the corporations! Tax the rich! Stop the cuts, fight for social justice for all. Standing in solidarity with http://www.usuncut.org/ and other Uncutters worldwide. FIGHT for a Foreclosure Moratorium! Foreclosure = homelessness. Resist the American Legislative Exchange Council, Grover Norquist and Citizen's United. #Austerity for the wheeler dealers, NOT the people.



We Are The 99% event

USuncutMN supports #occupyWallStreet, #occupyDC, the XL Pipeline resistance Yes, We, the People, are going to put democracy in all its forms up front and center. Open mic, diversity, nonviolent tactics .. Social media, economic democracy, repeal Citizen's United, single-payer healthcare, State Bank, Operation Feed the Homeless, anti-racism, homophobia, sexISM, war budgetting, lack of transparency, et al. Once we identify who we are and what we've lost, We can move forward.



Please sign and SHARE

Monday, April 30, 2012

Tackle Tax Havens

Tackle Tax Havens

http://www.tackletaxhavens.com/

Half the world's trade passes through them.
Right now they're hiding trillions of dollars on behalf of criminals, dictators, wealthy individuals and multinationals.
Find out what tax havens are, why they're so damaging and what we can do about it.

INEQUALITY BY THE NUMBERS

INEQUALITY BY THE NUMBERS
Tax rates





Take Action
on Inequality
Join a local action planned to mark this May 1 as “A Day Without the 99%.”
Move your money to send a message against big bank CEO profiteering.
Urge the SEC to require companies to report their CEO-to-worker pay ratios.
Start a Resilience Circle
for economic security and community building.


Tax Policy Center Library | List TPC Publications

TPC Library | List TPC Publications

Hightower's REAL REFORM of healthcare reform ...

Hightower Lowdown | The great American medicine show, a spectacle of deceit, manipulation, and flimflammery


A real reform

Cowboy hatBy Jim Hightower - Wed., 4/25/12
Bookmark and Share
What if drug marketers had to tell us the details of every under-the-table payment (aka bribes) that they make to doctors? Well, here's good news: One of the pluses in Obama's healthcare reform law, is that they will have to do just that, perhaps as soon as next year. Republican Sen. Charles Grassley added it to ObamaCare, requiring all drug companies to publish on a publicly accessible website (as yet unnamed) every payment that they make to doctors--including the name of recipients and the amount and exact reason for each "gift." Moreover, this reform has teeth. Federal officials will audit corporate records to assure complete disclosure. Failure to list a payment will result in a $10,000 fine for each deletion ($100,000 for knowingly hiding a payment), and top executives can be liable for omissions, since they must swear to the accuracy of each report.
Of course, industry lobbyists screeched: "Doctors may no longer want to engage in consulting arrangements," wailed one, "and such reluctance could chill innovation." Bullstuff. If such "arrangements" are above board, no sweat. The only thing that this breakthrough will chill is corruption. About time, too.

Amazon.com: The Age of Austerity: How Scarcity Will Remake American Politics (9780385535199): Thomas Byrne Edsall: Books

Amazon.com: The Age of Austerity: How Scarcity Will Remake American Politics (9780385535199): Thomas Byrne Edsall: Books

One of our most prescient political observers provides a sobering account of how pitched battles over scarce resources will increasingly define American politics in the coming years—and how we might avoid, or at least mitigate, the damage from these ideological and economic battles.
 
In a matter of just three years, a bitter struggle over limited resources has enveloped political discourse at every level in the United States. Fights between haves and have-nots over health care, unemployment benefits, funding for mortgage write-downs, economic stimulus legislation—and, at the local level, over cuts in police protection, garbage collection, and in the number of teachers—have dominated the debate. Elected officials are being forced to make zero-sum choices—or worse, choices with no winners.
     
Resource competition between Democrats and Republicans has left each side determined to protect what it has at the expense of the other. The major issues of the next few years—long-term deficit reduction; entitlement reform, notably of Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid; major cuts in defense spending; and difficulty in financing a continuation of American international involvement—suggest that your-gain-is-my-loss politics will inevitably intensify.

Keiser Report: Michael Hudson: Austerity, Debt and Fraudulent Conveyance « Dandelion Salad

Keiser Report: Michael Hudson: Austerity, Debt and Fraudulent Conveyance « Dandelion Salad


Keiser Report: Michael Hudson: Austerity, Debt and Fraudulent Conveyance

with Michael Hudson
Featured Writer
Dandelion Salad
http://michael-hudson.com
April 24, 2012
tax_rich&corps
Image by sandy_sanders via Flickr
Apr 24, 2012 by 
In this episode, Max Keiser and co-host, Stacy Herbert discuss debt piles and thin dimes. They also discuss Christine Lagarde begging for money outside Penn Station while insider trading bankers ‘charitably’ talk to beggars at Grand Central. In the second half of the show Max talks to economist Michael Hudson about the austerity, debt and fraudulent conveyance.

Michael Hudson is a former Wall Street economist. A Distinguished Research Professor at University of Missouri, Kansas City (UMKC), he is the author of many books, including Super Imperialism: The Economic Strategy of American Empire (new ed., Pluto Press, 2002) and Trade, Development and Foreign Debt: A History of Theories of Polarization v. Convergence in the World Economy. He can be reached via his website, mh@michael-hudson.com.
see

CNS STORY: Growing divestment campaign among churches targets biggest US banks

CNS STORY: Growing divestment campaign among churches targets biggest US banks



Demonstrators protest outside of the Wells Fargo shareholders meeting in San Francisco April 24, calling for bank officials to be more responsive to homeowners facing foreclosure. (CNS/Reuters)
By Dennis Sadowski
Catholic News Service

WASHINGTON (CNS) -- When Father Robert Rien, flanked by the staff of St. Ignatius of Antioch Parish, showed up at the Bank of America branch in Antioch, Calif., in 2009 to close out the church's account -- all of $135,000 -- the only thing on his mind was the plight of two dozen families in his flock struggling with their mortgages against the $2.3-trillion behemoth.

"We know it wasn't much," he said of the parish's savings. "But it sent a message and it started a movement."

Creating a movement was hardly on the minds of the parish council members who approved the divestment. They simply wanted to see the parish's cash assets invested locally to help their middle-class city of 102,000 residents, Father Rien said. But word of the divestment spread quickly and soon other congregations were taking the same step as California's housing crisis careened onward.

Since then, religious congregations have withdrawn about $40 million nationwide from the country's largest banks, including Bank of America, JP Morgan Chase, Wells Fargo and Citigroup, said Tim Lillienthal, lead organizer with the PICO National Network, the largest faith-based organizing network in the United States.

"We're trying to get the banks to listen to us to try to keep people in their homes," Lillienthal told Catholic News Service April 24. "People are asking, 'If they won't listen, what can we do? What level of action will get their attention?'"

The divestiture campaign has hardly placed a dent in the banks' deposits. In fact, one of the targets, Wells Fargo, which services more mortgages than any U.S. bank, has seen deposits increase for several quarters running, a company spokeswoman said.

Still, Father Rien, the administrator of St. Ignatius, justified the action, saying large banks must be held responsible for the "ruthlessness of what they have done to families."

The campaign to boost bank accountability has gained wider awareness across the country as hundreds of faith-based and grass-roots organizations began working alongside the Occupy Wall Street movement. The groups have succeeded in calling attention to executive compensation, secrecy in financial dealings and the banks' lobbying efforts to water down rules governing financial reform under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act passed in 2010.

Highly touted as a needed step to limit some of the banking practices that led to the 2007-2008 financial crisis, Dodd-Frank's impact has been far less than expected by consumer advocates as the rulemaking process has slowed to a crawl because of opposition from most segments of the financial industry.

In one of a long series of grass-roots responses, a vocal contingent of several hundred people marched from a prayer service at Harry Bridges Plaza to Wells Fargo's San Francisco headquarters where shareholders gathered April 24 in a standing-room-only meeting. Led by a group of faith leaders, including several Catholic priests, the peaceful protest called for a moratorium on home foreclosures and for the company to pay its fair share of taxes.

Two dozen protesters were arrested on misdemeanor charges as some shareholders in the group were denied entrance to the meeting even as other shareholders presented proxy statements and letters of invitation to guards behind barricades.

Father Jose Lucero, parochial vicar of Corpus Christi Parish in San Francisco, helped organize the event, which he said served to "raise awareness of the fact that banks are very unfair after they received fair treatment" thanks to government-backed bailouts worth billions of dollars.

"There's an injustice when all over people are out of work, people are underwater on their mortgages and they see companies like Wells Fargo get profits in the billions and give CEOs salaries in the millions," he said, citing the situation of several parishioners who face foreclosure.

"It's important for us as faith leaders to raise the issue that people are being treated very unjustly and very unfairly," he said.

Mary Eshet, Wells Fargo's corporate media relations manager, defended the company's actions, saying the bank has worked to help struggling borrowers stay in their homes.

She pointed to the 740,000 mortgage modifications and $4.1 billion in principle reduction the company has offered to homeowners since 2009. The bank also has conducted 720 home preservation workshops around the country, she said.

"We want to reach a workable solution," Eshet said. "That's good for the customer. It's good for the bank. It's good for the nation because it helps the housing situation."

One of the longest-running efforts to focus on banking accountability has operated with much less public attention for years. Several faith-based coalitions promoting socially responsible investment have challenged corporate decision-making through shareholder resolutions and public statements calling for transparency in financial dealings and justice for bank customers.

Oblate Father Seamus Finn, a member of the board of directors of the Interfaith Center for Corporate Responsibility, said all of the tactics are meant to get the attention of corporate officials about questionable business practices.

Father Finn, who planned to present resolutions during the annual meetings at JP Morgan Chase and the investment firm of Goldman Sachs in May, said the massive bank lobbying effort to minimize the impact of Dodd-Frank on trading and investment practices is high on the list of concerns being raised with corporate CEOs.

Citigroup officials and shareholders meeting in Dallas April 17 were confronted with those questions in a statement by Benedictine Sister Susan Mika, executive director of the Socially Responsible Investment Coalition based in San Antonio.

Sister Susan told CNS that she pointed to conflicts of interest between brokers and analysts, liabilities that are not listed on balance sheets, tax avoidance and risk management in derivatives trading. She also charged that the company was "spending enormous amounts of money to stall the rulemaking process" under Dodd-Frank.

The questions helped Citigroup's shareholders to give a vote of no confidence by 55 percent to 45 percent to the bank's executive compensation plan, which saw CEO Vikram Pandit receive nearly $14.9 million in compensation and retention benefits in 2011 despite serious challenges still facing the bank. Pandit received a symbolic $1 in compensation in 2010 and $128,741 in 2009 as the financial crisis took its toll.

Sister Susan said she told Pandit and the other Citigroup officials, "We've engaged you (for) many years and we're not going away."

Sunday, April 29, 2012

Lockheed Throws Its Weight Around (Again) | FPIF

Lockheed Throws Its Weight Around (Again) | FPIF

See, THIS is how AUSTERITY works (doesn't)

OpEdNews -The Meaning of "Austerity Measures" -- EuroSpeak for "Starve the Beast"

OpEdNews - Page 2 of Article: The Meaning of "Austerity Measures" -- EuroSpeak for "Starve the Beast"

By  (about the author)



The eurozone is slipping into a recession that could have been avoided. Had policymakers provided fiscal support for stricken countries in the South and guarantees on their government bonds, (as the USG does for US Treasuries) then their economies could have continued to grow while the necessary reforms were put in place. But the Troika (The IMF, the ECB, and the European Commission) decided to make the bailouts conditional on member states' acceptance of harsh austerity measures which forced leaders to slash government payrolls, services and programs. The result was entirely predictable; economic activity began to sputter as one country after another succumbed to a vicious slump.

So the downturn was a basically matter of choice, a self-inflicted wound brought on by poor decision-making in Brussels and Frankfurt. Anyone could see what the result was going to be because contractionary policy leads to economic contraction. Implement policies that are designed to shrink the economy, then the economy will shrink.

For the last month or so, the focus has mainly been on Spain, and for good reason. Spain's banking system is crumbling beneath the weight of tens of billions in non performing loans generated by the gigantic housing bubble which is still deflating. Unemployment in Spain is the highest in Europe at 24 percent. (Youth unemployment is over 50 percent) Even so, Spain's right wing PM Mariano Rajoy is attempting to reach the deficit targets demanded by the troika which will push unemployment higher while further deepening the depression. According to Der Speigel:

"The prime minister recently announced that he wants to reduce expenditures in the country's education and health system by C10 billion ... To meet the demands of the central government, the regions would have to slash 80,000 out of 500,000 teaching positions."
As you can see, austerity measures and debt consolidation are only adding to Spain's woes. Eventually, after much unnecessary misery, Spain will require a bailout, although ECB president Mario Draghi insists that this is not so.

But Europe's problems are not limited to Spain or countries on the periphery. France's output has slipped for a second month in a row and the pace of the decline is accelerating. The service sector is also showing signs of distress as belt tightening measures take hold and gradually reduce aggregate demand. Unemployment is edging higher as the slump deepens. According to data from Eurostat the seasonally adjusted jobless rate in France reached 10 percent in April, a 12-year high. Ballooning unemployment has led to an uptick in poverty which now affects 13.5 percent of the population. Austerity measures have led to a decline in personal consumption, an erosion of confidence, and a more generalized slow-down across all sectors. Still, intractable bankers and bureaucrats in Brussels and Frankfurt have not veered one bit from the original policy. They remain steadfast in their commitment to austerity.


Here's Draghi defending austerity in an interview with the Wall Street Journal:

"There was no alternative to fiscal consolidation, and we should not deny that this is contractionary in the short term. In the future there will be the so-called confidence channel, which will reactivate growth; but it's not something that happens immediately, and that's why structural reforms are so important, because the short-term contraction will be succeeded by long-term sustainable growth only if these reforms are in place." ("Q&A: ECB President Mario Draghi," Wall Street Journal)
Notice how Draghi does not defend austerity on the basis of any identifiable economic theory, nor does he cite any examples of austerity's successes. (Are there any?) Nor does he name any prominent economists who support the theory. It's all just "Trust us, we're the experts..." "contractionary expansion will work because we say so" even though the economy is sinking, unemployment and extreme poverty are at record highs, and the Eurozone is embroiled in the worst slump in the last 80 years. "Trust us. We know what we're doing."

And here's a sample of Draghi's views on taxation from the same interview:

"A 'good' consolidation is one where taxes are lower and the lower government expenditure is on infrastructures and other investments."... A 'bad' consolidation is actually the easier one to get ... by raising taxes and cutting capital expenditure."
Let's summarize: Cutting public spending and austerity, "Good." Raising taxes, "Bad." Isn't this the same right-wing blather we've heard for years?

"Austerity" amounts to  an attack on Europe's social model and aims to roll back the progressive advances of the last century. There's nearly universal agreement that belt-tightening doesn't lead to recovery, but just makes matters worse. Trimming deficits in the throes of a recession is a surefire way to choke off economic activity and foment social unrest. And so it has. Aside from turning many of the EU's biggest cities into free-fire zones, austerity is reshaping the political landscape and fueling radical elements on the right and left who are calling for an end to the 17-member union and a return to national sovereignty. (Hooray)

Still, policymakers seem oblivious to the political firestorm they've touched off. They remain focused laserlike on their primary objective, which is to make sure that a bigger share of the national wealth moves up the income chain. The way they do this is by demagoging the fake  "debt crisis" while their political lackeys and "technicians" slash pensions, health care and subsidies to protected industries; hack away at state budgets, reduce their federal workforce, crush organized labor, remove tariffs and taxes on capital, and privatize more public assets and services. Smaller government means less activity, fewer jobs, weaker demand, and greater hardship for working people. In other words, austerity achieves exactly what it was meant to achieve; bigger profits for the 1% and zilch for everyone else. Here's a clip from an article in Reuters:

"The euro zone's business slump deepened at a far faster pace than expected in April, suggesting the economy will stay in recession at least until the second half of the year.
"Today's dismal PMI figures clearly indicate that the euro zone economy remains in dire straits ... European factories had their worst month since June 2009. Companies said their order books were shrinking and they were cutting jobs in reaction to falling demand.

 "'There are no real drivers of growth here, which suggests that although the overall rate of decline is modest at the moment, we could see it continue to worsen in coming months,' said Chris Williamson, chief economist of PMI compiler Markit." ("Euro zone slump deepens unexpectedly in April," Reuters)


Draghi's "debt consolidation" and "structural reforms" have increased deflationary pressures and deepened the slump. They've been a total flop as anyone with half-a-brain could have predicted.
So, are we supposed to believe that the ECB president didn't know what the effect of his policies would be, that he didn't know that contractionary policies would result in economic contraction?
Of course, he knew. Draghi's not an idiot; he's a very competent economist. This just shows that he had an ulterior motive, that the policy was crafted to serve the interests of his banking buddies and not those of the 99%. After all, the real purpose of austerity is not to cut deficits or spur growth, but to stuff government into a fiscal starightjacket so that private industry and big finance get a bigger slice of the pie. Isn't that what this is really all about?

Sure, it is. Austerity is just the euro-version of "starve the beast."

This article cross-posted from Counterpunch

Saturday, April 28, 2012

www.familyhomelessness.org/media/314.pdf

www.familyhomelessness.org/media/314.pdf

Five steps to organizing against child homelessness

Shrinking Corporate Tax Rates - Graphic - NYTimes.com

Shrinking Corporate Tax Rates - Graphic - NYTimes.com


Shrinking Corporate Tax Rates

2006
2011
23%
$1.8
trillion
Reported corporate taxes
What American industries pay in taxes abroad
%
32.0
24.4
23.4
22.5
21.5
18.4
17.2
16.8
16.7
15.6
14.6
13.1
12.2
11.7
11.3
8.7
Apple
foreign
Apple
domestic
70%
61%
46%
32%
28%
30%
39%
54%
68%
72%
Apple’s allocation of profits
Sales
Long-term assets
Number of retail stores
Share of employees
vs.
Mining
Textiles
Food manufacturing
Retail trade
Construction
Printing and related
Utilities
Real estate
Wood products
Overall
Apparel
Chemical mfg.
Agriculture
Services
Finance
Computer and
electronic product
manufacturing
Some tax experts say that Apple moves more profits offshore than appears justified by its operations, which are largely in the United States. And overseas, technology companies pay particularly low taxes.
... and corporate tax rates have fallen.
Corporate profits are far bigger now than they were in 1977, the year Apple was incorporated ...
Adjusted for
inflation
The reported effective
corporate tax rate
%
50
40
30
20
10
Total United States
corporate profits
trillion
$2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
’10
’05
’00
’95
’90
’85
’80
’77
’10
’05
’00
’95
’90
’85
’80
’77

Thursday, April 26, 2012

The 1930′s Forgotten Economic Lessons | 404 System Error

The 1930′s Forgotten Economic Lessons | 404 System Error


The 1930′s Forgotten Economic Lessons

April 18, 2012
By 

The 1930′s Forgotten Economic Lessons

Three mistakes world leaders learned from the Great Depression, and forgot.

Originally Published | Arbitrage Magazine
By: Ellie Chan

The eurozone debt crisis is Europe’s first financial crunch since the introduction of the Euro. EU leaders are stupefied by a crisis they have no experience in dealing with, just as central bankers and political leaders were stunned by the first market crash in 1929. It is alarming to see that the world leaders are marching in the footsteps of their predecessors, who made all the wrong decisions that led to the Great Depression.
1. THE GREAT IMBALANCE

One of the greatest global imbalances in modern history was after the First World War. To financethe war, Europe borrowed heavily from the US government. Under the rules of the gold standard, Europeans had to take gold bullions out from the reserve vaults and ship them to the US Federal Reserve Banks. The Allies borrowed so much debt from the United States that, after the war ended, the Fed accumulated $4.5 billion out of $6 billion of circulated gold. That is 75 percent of all circulated money in the four major economic powers in the world (Britain, Germany, France, and United States).
The gross imbalance in gold distribution blocked the smooth machination of the gold standard. The lack of gold in Europe exacerbated the post-war economic turmoil. A fight for gold between Britain, France, and Germany soured their relationship. Since the United States possessed the largest gold collection, Britain lost its status as the world’s financial city, and never regained the position since. France attracted foreign money due to an undervalued franc, and hoarded its bullions while its European counterparts were starving for gold. Paul Einzig, author of the Lombard Street column for the Financial News, wrote that it was “the French gold hoarding policy which brought about the slump in commodity prices, which in turn was the main cause of the economic depression; that it is the unwillingness of France to cooperate with other nations which has aggravated the depression into a violent crisis.” Germany, faced with empty reserve vaults, war reparations, a nation under reconstruction, and economic slump, was in trouble. It had no other choice but to maniacally print money that resulted in the tragic period of hyperinflation.
The Great Crash on Wall Street in 1929 was the tipping point. It sent shockwaves across the Atlantic Ocean, and Europe plummeted into the Great Depression. The global imbalance in the post-war world formed a backdrop for a great financial disaster. Today, our world is reaching a concerning point of imbalance: nations being either big savers, or big spenders. China and Germany both have enormous account surpluses – the world’s first and second, respectively. China alone accumulated a foreign reserve totalling $3.2 trillion. China and Germany have become the biggest money savers of the world, and are now expected to be the saviours of the world, too.
The rest of the world (the peripheral eurozone countries, France, the United States) is trillion dollars in debt. They spent more money than they could raise through taxes, and they borrowed more from other countries than they could repay. The consequences are slow to show, but they are surfacing after a generation’s time. On one side of the globe, the economy is sucked into a hopeless cycle of contraction and austerity, which in turn leads to more contraction. There are outbursts of public unrest and political instability. More people are losing the lifestyle they once knew. On the other side, the economy is booming, investment money is pouring in, and many more are rising to a favourable living standard. A world this much out of balance is dangerous for everyone, including the seemingly prosperous countries.
2. STUBBORNNESS

Up until the Second World War, global financiers were devoted to the gold standard in bringing long-term price stability and strict control on inflation. At the outbreak of World War I, Britain, Germany, France, and the United States all abandoned the gold standard to finance the war. Everyone saw it as a temporary policy, and central bankers were adamant to take the world back on gold.
However, the post-war world was very different from the one before. All gold has fled Europe to the United States; Europe’s vaults were nearly empty. But Britain, always a strong advocate of the gold standard, returned to gold in 1925 at an unrealistically high exchange rate. British goods suddenly became very expensive. Exports dropped, factories closed down, unemployment spiked, and the entire nation spiralled into recession. Montagu Norman, the central banker at the time, was stubborn on bringing prestige back to the sterling and did not understand that the overvalued pound was staggering the British economy.
In the midst of the Great Depression, in 1931, Norman finally took the pound sterling off the gold standard. The currency was no longer pegged to gold, allowing the central bank to lower interest rate to free up money and stimulate the economy. Though economists initially condemned the decision, they could not deny the benefits Britain gained from being off gold. The devalued pound cheapened British exports again. Manufacturing revived, people returned to work, and Britain was, in fact, the first country to emerge from the Great Depression.
Liaquat Ahamed, Pulitzer Prize winner of his book “Lords of Finance”, blames Norman and other central bankers in the 1930′s for pushing the world into the Great Depression: “[M]ore than anyone else they were responsible for the … fundamental error of economic policy … to take the world back onto the gold standard.” The stubbornness of one central banker prolonged Britain’s misery for six years. In the current crisis, Angela Merkel’s stubbornness is similarly prolonging European woes. It seems the German Chancellor rejected many possible solutions. She refused for many months for contributing more capital into the European Financial Stability Facility (EFSF), the eurozone rescue fund. She ruled out European Central Bank (ECB) funding in the EFSF. She also opposes to the idea of eurobonds, which are eurozone government debt with joint liability. Merkel was hesitant for good reasons. She wanted to utilise market pressure to discipline the troubled economies, instead of handing them free money and giving them a pass out of this mess. But we saw the contagion reaching the German Bund market, with a disappointing bond auction in November. S&P credit agency also put Germany on negative credit watch that threatens its triple A standing.
Unable to contain the growing crisis spreading into her country, Merkel is clearly desperate to win back market confidence. She aggressively announced, on December 14, of EU’s long-term progression to become a fiscal union. But at this stage, the crisis already consumed Europe. Such a decision would have had the “bazooka effect” on markets at the beginning of the year, but now the stakes are higher, and investors remain sceptics.
3. A MISSING BACKBONE

What escalated into the Great Depression was a US banking crisis triggered by the collapse of a private bank called Bank of United States (BUS). Despite its official-sounding name, it had no relationship with the US government. As the bank became insolvent, the Fed believed they could build a strong enough firewall around its collapse. They decided not to bail it out.
The failure of BUS, a high-profile bank, changed public sentiment very quickly. Depositors lost confidence as they could no longer tell whether a bank was healthy or not, so they indiscriminately started pulling their money out of all banks. What resulted was a scramble for credit across the system.
The Fed could control the credit crunch by injecting cash into the banking system, but the governors refused to act. Only half of the banks in the country joined the Federal Reserve system, and the governors did not think it was their responsibility to safeguard these non-member banks; although collectively, these banks had a large impact on the credit system. In 1931, one out of every ten banks in the country closed down. Confidence vanished, and thus marked the beginning of the unstoppable bank runs that swept across the nation between 1931 and 1932.
Legislation finally passed in 1932 to allow the Fed to inject $1 billion of cash into banks – the Fed was finally pumping money into the system on a required scale. But it was too late, by then, the United States, like the rest of the world, had entered the darkest year in the Depression.
The lack of funding support from the central bank is a mistake policymakers are repeating today. The ECB refuses to pour money into the EFSF (it is also unlikely to contribute to the European Stability Mechanism), or commit to large-scale bond buying, or act as the lender of last resort. Similar to the Fed’s narrow criteria of its responsibilities, the ECB devotes to a narrow definition of central banking. Its sole purpose is to control price stability within the eurozone, which means keeping inflation low. Jens Weidmann, President of the Bundesbank, said the ECB’s mandate prevents it from embarking on unlimited bond purchases and past experience showed this would inevitably lead to inflation. With the crisis at this stage, economic outlook for 2012 is bleak. Many economists are predicting recession: Financial Times reported 72% believe Europe will enter a recession in the next 12 months. The ECB should instead worry about deflation, and if it is to fulfil its objective to stabilize prices, which prevents prices from falling, then quantitative easing (buying of government bonds) is necessary.
STEPPING FORWARD

The eurozone debt crisis is nowhere near the magnitude of the Great Depression. The 1930′s tragedy remains a far outlier of the sufferings mankind experienced in modern history. It is the largest sequence of errors made, and from which decision makers still draw lessons to ensure it does not happen again. But contrary to stepping forward, we see once again that the world is unwilling to rebalance itself, that leaders are unreasonably stubborn about their own standpoint, and that the central bank is so narrow-sighted that it becomes passive during a great calamity. All three things are within our power to change, though some will take longer than others. But if we do not take a different course, and quickly, history may repeat itself.

ARB Team
Arbitrage Magazine
Business News with BITE
*End*

Canadian economy: Don’t expect full employment for another four years
European Banks Risk New Global Financial Crisis, IMF Warns
The Greatest Depression Has Only Begun
 THE GIANT BANKS ARE KILLING THE US ECONOMY
UNEMPLOYMENT IN THE US AND CANADA: New Round of Mass Layoffs in North America

404 ARCHIVE:
Increasingly in Europe, Suicides ‘by Economic Crisis
Look back in hunger: Britain’s silent, scandalous epidemic
Austerity vs solidarity: Democratic legitimacy and Europe’s future
Austerity Suicide Note: “no other solution than this dignified end to my life”
Oh Canada! Imposing Austerity on the World’s Most Resource-Rich Country
Federal Budget: Welcome to the 1930s
Budget 2012: Government Spendings on Crime, Military, Oil, Marketing
404 Project: #OpProRogue
IMF chief warns of new Great Depression
Austerity: A Myth
Austerity: Manufacturing Poverty
Canada: Austerity
Role of “Radicals” In Canadian Democracy
How Canada Erodes the Canadian Way of Life for Us All