USuncutMN says: Tax the corporations! Tax the rich! Stop the cuts, fight for social justice for all. Standing in solidarity with http://www.usuncut.org/ and other Uncutters worldwide. FIGHT for a Foreclosure Moratorium! Foreclosure = homelessness. Resist the American Legislative Exchange Council, Grover Norquist and Citizen's United. #Austerity for the wheeler dealers, NOT the people.



We Are The 99% event

USuncutMN supports #occupyWallStreet, #occupyDC, the XL Pipeline resistance Yes, We, the People, are going to put democracy in all its forms up front and center. Open mic, diversity, nonviolent tactics .. Social media, economic democracy, repeal Citizen's United, single-payer healthcare, State Bank, Operation Feed the Homeless, anti-racism, homophobia, sexISM, war budgetting, lack of transparency, et al. Once we identify who we are and what we've lost, We can move forward.



Please sign and SHARE

Showing posts with label US Congress. Show all posts
Showing posts with label US Congress. Show all posts

Thursday, September 29, 2011

The Fed's $16 Trillion Bailouts Under-reported


federal reserve bank building
Image by telmo32 via Flickr
The media’s inscrutable brush-off of the Government Accounting Office’s recently released audit of the Federal Reserve has raised many questions about the Fed’s goings-on since the financial crisis began in 2008.
The audit of the Fed’s emergency lending programs was scarcely reported by mainstream media – albeit the results are undoubtedly newsworthy.  It is the first audit of the Fed in United States history since its beginnings in 1913.  The findings verify that over $16 trillion was allocated to corporations and banks internationally, purportedly for “financial assistance” during and after the 2008 fiscal crisis.
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) amended the Wall Street Reform law to audit the Fed, pushing the GAO to step in and take a look around.  Upon hearing the announcement that the first-ever audit would take place in July, the media was bowled over and nearly every broadcast network and newspaper covered the story.  However, the audit’s findings were almost completely overlooked, even with a number as high as $16 trillion staring all of us in the face.
Sanders press release, dated July 21st, stated:
“No agency of the United States government should be allowed to bailout a foreign bank or corporation without the direct approval of Congress and the president.”
The report serves as a clear testimony of the Fed’s emergency action plan to bailout foreign corporations and banks in a time of crisis, but the GAO reportdoes not berate the Fed; rather, it provides a lucid explanation of where the money was allocated and why.
According to The Washington Post, “The GAO report did not condemn the Fed’s actions, it simply illuminated them.  The GAO also recommended that the Fed make clearer and more rigorous its policies for hiring independent contractors to manage investment programs.”
A wider investigation of the Fed is due on October 18th, which will provide more thorough details.   The GAO report said that the Fed issued “conflict of interest waivers to employees and private contractors so they could keep investments in the same financial institutions and corporations that were given emergency loans.”  The audit will inspect the “conflicts of interest” and the inner-workings of the Fed’s emergency-lending programs.
For Sanders, one thing is clear: “The Federal Reserve must be reformed to serve the needs of working families, not just CEOs on Wall Street.”

Tuesday, August 2, 2011

Angry Constituents Converge on Rep Erik Paulsen’s Office

http://www.theuptake.org/2011/07/27/angry-constituents-converge-on-rep-erik-paulsens-office/


An angry, sometimes hostile crowd of about 75 of Congressman Erik Paulsen’s constituents gathered at his Eden Prairie office to express serious concern over his support of drastic budget cuts proposed by the House Republicans.
The overflow crowd was a broad cross section of voters from his district representing a range of ages. There were some supporters, but most expressed extreme displeasure with the way Paulsen and the political parties are facing the crisis.
One constituent saw the meeting as a microcosm of what is happening in Washington.
“It’s kind of hard to have a productive dialog or conversation in a more confrontational environment … And I think that part of the thing is , we’re kind of seeing this in Congress right now. Because a lot of people aren’t willing to even listen to other points of views even though they know we have to meet some kind of kind of compromise. But that’s kind of where we’re at. And I think what we have to do is find some way around that so that we can work together.
Representative Paulsen was not present for the meeting, instead sending a staffer to talk to the crowd.The UpTake was not allowed to tape the what happened but we were allowed to stay and talked to people after the meeting.
“People asked a bunch of questions and we didn’t get much for answers” said one attendee after the meeting.
Several noted Paulsen’s staff member was new (he has been with Paulsen only since January) and didn’t have many answers. The staff member said he didn’t know what ALEC (American Legislative Exchange Council) was even though Paulsen is known to be associated with it. ALEC is notorious for writing many right-wing bills that have been passed in state legislatures in a cookie cutter fashion.
Some were upset that Paulsen held a tele-town hall meeting right while President Obama was speaking Monday night, trying to draw them away from the TV set to talk in an environment where Paulsen can control the conversation, yet Paulsen was not willing to show up today to face the angry crowd.
“It’s always interesting that we never seem to be able to talk to Representative Paulsen. He’s always gone or doing something else and yet we’re all his constituents,” said one of the attendees. “He chooses not to be available and this is time for him to hear what our views are and our concerns and it’s really becoming a tragic time in our country’s history and he’s part of that.”
When the anger subsided a bit, most were pleading for balanced, non-ideological solutions including restore more tax fairness with increased upper income taxes, stopping many of the federal studies plus balanced budget cuts including the Wars and subsidies to a variety of businesses. The threats to Social Security and Medicare were a major part of the source of anger.
“It’s deplorable what our country is right now”, said one man after the meeting. ” We’re being controlled by a fringe element of a political party. It’s absolutely disgusting and we’re going to go down the tubes here economically very shortly if that rest of that party continues to kow-tow to that minority.”
Others missed their former Republican representative Jim Ramstad. “I mean Ramstad was a moderate and I don’t think he would have supported half the stuff that this guy Paulsen does. I was a Republican all my life until Bush. When Bush came along I cant’… my bumper sticker says ‘Too poor to be a Republican. Too smart to be a Democrat’ And so I joined the coffee party.”
This meeting was organized by MoveOn.org in cooperation with a number of other volunteer groups and was part of a nation-wide series of meetings on this day at all Congressional Offices.
  •  2
Crowd at Rep. Erik Paulsen's office
CLICK PICTURE TO HEAR WHAT PEOPLE HAD TO SAY AFTER MEETING WITH STAFF FROM CONGRESSMAN PAULSEN'S OFFICE

Monday, August 1, 2011

THE DEBT CEILING 'DEAL' : ‘class economic warfare by legislation’

“The $1 Trillion Debt Ceiling Deal of July 31”




Change Text Size a- | A+


Sunday evening, July 31, President Obama and Senate Majority and Minority leaders, Harry Reid and Mitch McConnell, announced they had reached an agreement on cutting $1 trillion in spending in exchange for raising the debt ceiling. House Speaker, Boehner, indicated he was also in agreement, subject to voting to take place in the House on Monday.

This latest ‘deal’ is essentially the same that was reached by Harry Reid in the Senate on July 29 and Boehner in the House on July 27, with two major changes—one favored by the Republicans and another by Obama. These two changes were then ‘traded off’ this weekend, bringing the parties to a deal.

Boehner and Reid essentially came to an agreement last Friday, July 29. Their respective July 29 (Reid) and July 27 (Boehner) positions called for $917 to $927 in spending cuts, only $10 billion apart. Both proposals contained no reference to tax loophole closings. The tax hikes idea was given up by Obama and the Democrats early last week, bringing the Democrats to essentially the Republican position on spending vs. tax hikes. The only substantive difference as of July 29 between the two was that Reid also proposed $1.044 trillion in additional cuts in Defense spending, as well as a measure that prohibited a re-opening of the debt ceiling issue before the 2012 November elections.

Today’s Boehner-Reid final agreement effectively drops explicit cuts in Defense, another Republican position all along. Reid’s defense cuts are now replaced with ‘triggers’ in defense spending reduction. The ‘triggers’ concept has been a maneuver used by Congress on occasion in the past. It is designed to let one party save face, allowing it to appear that their provision is retained in the bill, when in reality it will never be implemented. In fact, ‘triggers’ have never been implemented in any instance since 1980 in which they were included in a spending bill.

With Defense spending cuts taken effectively ‘off the table’ this weekend, the only remaining substantive issue was whether the debt ceiling would be allowed to come up as an issue before the 2012 elections. Republicans now agree it will not.

This Republican shift means Reid’s previously proposed $1 trillion additional cuts in Defense appears, in retrospect, to have been a ‘trading item’ and tactical maneuver all along to get the Republicans to agree not to revisit the debt ceiling issue again before the coming 2012 elections.

But the Republican leaders in the House and Senate don’t need a debt ceiling issue again to get further cuts. The 2012 budget deadline of October 1 will do just as well for a threat to shut down the government.

So, in summary, it appears the deal just negotiated means both parties agree on cutting $1 trillion in spending only, with no tax hikes. The Republicans will shift to the 2012 budget deadline for a new hammer to extract extra spending cuts. Defense will remain effectively untouched. And, in exchange for $1 trillion in cuts and no tax hikes and leaving defense spending untouched Obama gets an agreement not to raise the debt ceiling issue again before his next election. But don’t think that’s the end of the story. It’s just the beginning.

The bigger attack on social security, Medicare, Medicaid is still to come. The next round in what amounts to ‘class economic warfare by legislation’ is the 2012 budget negotiations that are supposed to conclude by September 23. Republicans will get another ‘bite of the apple’ in spending only cuts at that time. And Obama and Democrats will likely cave in to those demands yet again, as they have repeatedly the past year.

But the even bigger bite will come as a result of another provision in today’s agreement: the creation of a so-called ‘Bipartisan Commission’ to reduce the debt and deficits by even greater magnitudes. That Commission will make still further major proposals for cuts by November of this year, to be voted on by Congress before year-end.

Following Senators Reid and McConnell, President Obama spoke on national TV tonight to endorse the tentative Boehner-Reid agreement and to announce the ‘Bi-Partisan Debt Reduction Commission’. In his brief comments this evening he employed an important phrase that TV commentators mostly overlooked. He said,  “The Commission’s proposals will be submitted for an up or down vote only” by members of Congress. That means some small group—no doubt appointed by him or Congressional leaders—will now decide solely between themselves the composition and magnitude of cuts in Medicare, Social Security, Medicaid, how much tax loopholes will be closed, and how much Defense spending will be cut. The rest of Congress will then be limited to voting ‘yea’ or ‘nay’ and that’s it.

The conservative composition of such appointed commissions in the recent past are well known. There was the Simpson-Bowles deficit commission appointed by Obama in 2009 that was lopsidedly conservative. And Obama’s commission to recommend Health Care legislation that was composed of mostly conservative Republican and Democrats. The forthcoming ‘Bipartisan Commission’ will almost certainly assume the same conservative-leaning composition. We can expect $2 in cuts in Medicare and Social Security for every $1 in tax loophole closing and Defense spending reductions…if we’re lucky.

This deal of the past weekend to raise the debt ceiling in exchange for $1 trillion in spending cuts—with no tax hikes or defense cuts—shows clearly that politicians in Washington are concerned first and foremost with their re-elections. Democrats don’t want to be confronted with another debt ceiling debacle during their re-election campaign. Both Republicans and Democrats are, furthermore, intent on protecting their Defense industry friends, and on ensuring their corporate campaign contributors don’t have to pay their fair share in taxes. The rest of America gets to pay the bills and pay the price.

Jack Rasmus is the author of ‘Epic Recession: Prelude to Global Depression’, Palgrave-Macmillan and Pluto Press, 2010; and the forthcoming ‘Obama’s Economy: Recovery for the Few’, same publishers, 2011. His blog is jackrasmus.com and website: www.kyklosproductions.com.

Saturday, July 30, 2011

Social Security and the Deficit (ALSO SEE LINK - FACTCHECK)

Social Security and the Deficit
http://factcheck.org/2011/07/debt-limit-debate-round-up/
Democratic Rep. Xavier Becerra of California said that he would "fight to take [Social Security] off the table" in budget negotiations, because it "hasn't contributed 1 cent to the deficit that we face today, nor 1 cent to any of the national debt, the $14.3 trillion." We take no position on whether Social Security should be cut, but it's wrong to say it's not contributing to the deficit.
Social Security benefits paid were more than payroll taxes in 2010, leading to a cash deficit of $49 billion. For 2011, the Social Security and Medicare Boards of Trustees project a $46 billion deficit. And those figures don't include the billions more the government will have to borrow to cover that reduction in payroll taxes that was in last year's deal to extend the Bush tax cuts.
Twists and Turns on the Debt July 12

Thursday, July 28, 2011

KeepOurPromise has huge successful Lobby and Call-in Day

Hugely Successful Lobby and Call-in Day!
News Latest
Written by Mike Hersh   
Thursday, 28 July 2011 08:47

KeepOurPromise organizers and allies met with 80 Congressional offices yesterday, July 27th, and led 1,000s of people nation-wide in a call in day. We told Senators and House members that cuts to Medicaid, Medicare, and Social Security benefits would hurt tens of millions of Americans. Jobs will be lost. Economic growth will suffer. We demand that our politicians keep our promise between generations and among all Americans to preserve, protect--and even expand and improve--Medicaid, Medicare and Social Security.

We need your help now! Contributions have been coming in, but not enough to cover our expanding activities. (Contributions to Keep Our Promise are not tax deductible).

We're helping to convene a series of Congressional briefings and hearings. We're launching a media strategy to inform and mobilize the public, and holding call-in days to jam the White House and Congressional switchboards. We're explaining that Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid are not "broke," and do not add to the debt or deficit. We should cut corruption and corporate profiteering--not benefits. To control costs and provide the best outcomes, we need Expanded, Improved Medicare for All. Help us Save Medicaid, Medicare, and Social Security.

We're working with members of Congress and staffers, the Black, Progressive and Hispanic Caucus, as well as progressive, faith, patients' rights and civil rights leaders and organizations, unions, and more. We convene weekly action meetings to plan lobby days, call-in days, Congressional hearings, town hall meetings, a media strategy and special events. We're holding a massive citizen's lobby day July 20th. We're meeting with 85 members of Congress with a simple message: No cuts to Medicaid, Medicare or Social Security. Let Medicare negotiate with big drug companies on prices. Improve and expand Medicare--don't cut it! Help us Save Medicaid, Medicare, and Social Security. 
We need your help now! (Contributions to Keep Our Promise are not tax deductible).

Wednesday, July 20, 2011

FRANKEN DESTOYS FOCUS ON THE FAMILY WITNESS, EXPOSES MISUSE OF HHS STUDY | During this morning’s Senate DOMA hearings, Sen. Al Franken (D-MN) destroyed Focus on the Family’s Tom Minnery’s argument that children are better off with opposite-sex parents by demonstrating how Minnery misrepresented an HHS study. The study — which Minnery cited to oppose marriage equality — actually found that children do best in two-parent households, regardless of the parents’ gender. Watch it: